case for the existence of synthetic

How does Kant make the case for the existence of synthetic a priori judgements? How is this account a response to David Hume? Do you think Kant’s argument is convincing? Why or why not?

Using only Humes “enquiry Concerning Human Understanding” and Kants “Prolegomena to an future metaphysics”
Make sure it has a clear thesis
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

 

Testimonials

case for the existence of synthetic